Today, the WSJ carries an editorial from Harvard economics Professor Robert Barro entitled, “The Folly of Subsidizing Unemployment.” It explores a theory I subscribe to (and have been writing about for months) that the unemployment rate is higher than it should be due to the extension of jobless benefits from 26 weeks to 99 weeks.
Barro’s argument is the same one used in the 1990s that led to welfare reform in the United States. “The loss in efficiency results partly because the program subsidizes unemployment, causing insufficient job-search, job-acceptance and levels of employment. A further inefficiency concerns the distortions from … …READ MORE








